↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Global Posture Reeducation and of Static Stretching on Pain, Range of Motion, and Quality of Life in Women with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Global Posture Reeducation and of Static Stretching on Pain, Range of Motion, and Quality of Life in Women with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
Clinics, December 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322008000600010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Cláudia Violino Cunha, Thomaz Nogueira Burke, Fábio Jorge Renovato França, Amélia Pasqual Marques

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 358 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 74 20%
Student > Master 61 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Student > Postgraduate 24 7%
Researcher 21 6%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 97 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 78 21%
Sports and Recreations 28 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Neuroscience 7 2%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 105 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#667
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,752
of 179,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.