You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Blood-Based Screening Tool for Alzheimer's Disease That Spans Serum and Plasma: Findings from TARC and ADNI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0028092 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sid E. O'Bryant, Guanghua Xiao, Robert Barber, Ryan Huebinger, Kirk Wilhelmsen, Melissa Edwards, Neill Graff-Radford, Rachelle Doody, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, for the Texas Alzheimer's Research & Care Consortium, for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative |
| Abstract |
There is no rapid and cost effective tool that can be implemented as a front-line screening tool for Alzheimer's disease (AD) at the population level. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 28 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 9% |
| Psychology | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,984,627
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,529
of 193,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,216
of 240,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#295
of 2,869 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,869 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.