You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What Precision Medicine Can Learn from Rare Genetic Disease Research and Translation.
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1001/amajethics.2018.834 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Holly K Tabor, Aaron Goldenberg |
Abstract |
The goal of this article is to examine the intersections of precision health and rare diseases. Specifically, we propose 3 lessons from the last decade of applying genomics to rare diseases: (1) precision can end one odyssey and start another; (2) precise interventions can exacerbate health disparities and create other ethical dilemmas; and (3) democratization of data will transform research and translation. By studying experiences of patients with rare diseases, researchers, clinicians, and policymakers can anticipate similar challenges in precision medicine and hopefully mitigate potential harms or injustices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 20% |
Canada | 5 | 14% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 71% |
Scientists | 7 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Librarian | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 20% |
Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,532,717
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#465
of 2,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,455
of 350,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AMA Journal of Ethic
#20
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.