↓ Skip to main content

The role of miniaturization in the evolution of the mammalian jaw and middle ear

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
393 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of miniaturization in the evolution of the mammalian jaw and middle ear
Published in
Nature, September 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0521-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan Lautenschlager, Pamela G. Gill, Zhe-Xi Luo, Michael J. Fagan, Emily J. Rayfield

Abstract

The evolution of the mammalian jaw is one of the most important innovations in vertebrate history, and underpins the exceptional radiation and diversification of mammals over the last 220 million years1,2. In particular, the transformation of the mandible into a single tooth-bearing bone and the emergence of a novel jaw joint-while incorporating some of the ancestral jaw bones into the mammalian middle ear-is often cited as a classic example of the repurposing of morphological structures3,4. Although it is remarkably well-documented in the fossil record, the evolution of the mammalian jaw still poses the paradox of how the bones of the ancestral jaw joint could function both as a joint hinge for powerful load-bearing mastication and as a mandibular middle ear that was delicate enough for hearing. Here we use digital reconstructions, computational modelling and biomechanical analyses to demonstrate that the miniaturization of the early mammalian jaw was the primary driver for the transformation of the jaw joint. We show that there is no evidence for a concurrent reduction in jaw-joint stress and increase in bite force in key non-mammaliaform taxa in the cynodont-mammaliaform transition, as previously thought5-8. Although a shift in the recruitment of the jaw musculature occurred during the evolution of modern mammals, the optimization of mandibular function to increase bite force while reducing joint loads did not occur until after the emergence of the neomorphic mammalian jaw joint. This suggests that miniaturization provided a selective regime for the evolution of the mammalian jaw joint, followed by the integration of the postdentary bones into the mammalian middle ear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 393 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 36 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 40 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 403. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#75,978
of 25,856,138 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#5,602
of 98,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,432
of 352,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#124
of 1,067 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,067 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.