↓ Skip to main content

Advanced therapy medicinal products and health technology assessment principles and practices for value-based and sustainable healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advanced therapy medicinal products and health technology assessment principles and practices for value-based and sustainable healthcare
Published in
HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10198-018-1007-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bengt Jönsson, Grace Hampson, Jonathan Michaels, Adrian Towse, J.-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg, Olivier Wong

Abstract

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are beginning to reach European markets, and questions are being asked about their value for patients and how healthcare systems should pay for them. To identify and discuss potential challenges of ATMPs in view of current health technology assessment (HTA) methodology-specifically economic evaluation methods-in Europe as it relates to ATMPs, and to suggest potential solutions to these challenges. An Expert Panel reviewed current HTA principles and practices in relation to the specific characteristics of ATMPs. Three key topics were identified and prioritised for discussion-uncertainty, discounting, and health outcomes and value. The panel discussed that evidence challenges linked to increased uncertainty may be mitigated by collection of follow-on data, use of value of information analysis, and/or outcomes-based contracts. For discount rates, an international, multi-disciplinary forum should be established to consider the economic, social and ethical implications of the choice of rate. Finally, consideration of the feasibility of assessing the value of ATMPs beyond health gain may also be key for decision-making. ATMPs face a challenge in demonstrating their value within current HTA frameworks. Consideration of current HTA principles and practices with regards to the specific characteristics of ATMPs and continued dialogue will be key to ensuring appropriate market access. I.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 202 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Master 21 10%
Other 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 80 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 51 25%
Unknown 79 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,556,306
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#52
of 1,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,308
of 352,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HEPAC Health Economics in Prevention and Care
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.