↓ Skip to main content

Information Routing Driven by Background Chatter in a Signaling Network

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Information Routing Driven by Background Chatter in a Signaling Network
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002297
Pubmed ID
Authors

Núria Domedel-Puig, Pau Rué, Antonio J. Pons, Jordi García-Ojalvo

Abstract

Living systems are capable of processing multiple sources of information simultaneously. This is true even at the cellular level, where not only coexisting signals stimulate the cell, but also the presence of fluctuating conditions is significant. When information is received by a cell signaling network via one specific input, the existence of other stimuli can provide a background activity -or chatter- that may affect signal transmission through the network and, therefore, the response of the cell. Here we study the modulation of information processing by chatter in the signaling network of a human cell, specifically, in a Boolean model of the signal transduction network of a fibroblast. We observe that the level of external chatter shapes the response of the system to information carrying signals in a nontrivial manner, modulates the activity levels of the network outputs, and effectively determines the paths of information flow. Our results show that the interactions and node dynamics, far from being random, confer versatility to the signaling network and allow transitions between different information-processing scenarios.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Malaysia 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 57 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 27%
Researcher 18 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 14%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 35%
Physics and Astronomy 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Engineering 7 11%
Computer Science 5 8%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2011.
All research outputs
#3,705,429
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,189
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,457
of 249,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#28
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.