You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Practical Approach to the Management of Complications During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.052 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francesco Giannini, Luciano Candilio, Satoru Mitomo, Neil Ruparelia, Alaide Chieffo, Luca Baldetti, Francesco Ponticelli, Azeem Latib, Antonio Colombo |
Abstract |
Percutaneous coronary intervention relieves symptoms in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease resistant to optimal medical therapy and alters the natural history of acute coronary syndromes. However, adverse procedural outcomes may occur during the intervention. Knowledge of possible complications and their timely management are essential for the practicing cardiologist and can be life-saving for the patient. In this review, the authors summarize potential complications of percutaneous coronary intervention focusing on their practical management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 19 | 12% |
Mexico | 11 | 7% |
Colombia | 9 | 6% |
Argentina | 8 | 5% |
Spain | 7 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
India | 6 | 4% |
Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Other | 25 | 15% |
Unknown | 66 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 120 | 74% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 14% |
Scientists | 16 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 12% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 15% |
Unknown | 45 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 41% |
Engineering | 6 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 51 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#460,077
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#72
of 4,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,729
of 346,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#2
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.