↓ Skip to main content

Factorial Validity and Invariance of the 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) Among Populations With and Without Self-Reported Psychiatric Diagnostic Status

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factorial Validity and Invariance of the 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) Among Populations With and Without Self-Reported Psychiatric Diagnostic Status
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satomi Doi, Masaya Ito, Yoshitake Takebayashi, Kumiko Muramatsu, Masaru Horikoshi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Professor 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 29 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Engineering 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 34 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#23,407,950
of 26,078,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#27,987
of 34,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,638
of 355,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#649
of 750 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,078,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 750 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.