The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fossils reveal the complex evolutionary history of the mammalian regionalized spine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aar3126 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K E Jones, K D Angielczyk, P D Polly, J J Head, V Fernandez, J K Lungmus, S Tulga, S E Pierce |
| Abstract |
A unique characteristic of mammals is a vertebral column with anatomically distinct regions, but when and how this trait evolved remains unknown. We reconstructed vertebral regions and their morphological disparity in the extinct forerunners of mammals, the nonmammalian synapsids, to elucidate the evolution of mammalian axial differentiation. Mapping patterns of regionalization and disparity (heterogeneity) across amniotes reveals that both traits increased during synapsid evolution. However, the onset of regionalization predates increased heterogeneity. On the basis of inferred homology patterns, we propose a "pectoral-first" hypothesis for region acquisition, whereby evolutionary shifts in forelimb function in nonmammalian therapsids drove increasing vertebral modularity prior to differentiation of the vertebral column for specialized functions in mammals. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 15% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 103 | 66% |
| Scientists | 47 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 16% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 41% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 199. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#209,550
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,896
of 83,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,089
of 355,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#171
of 1,223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.