↓ Skip to main content

Rejection of rejection: a novel approach to overcoming barriers to publication

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 34,493)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
3280 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
74 Facebook pages
googleplus
25 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Rejection of rejection: a novel approach to overcoming barriers to publication
Published in
British Medical Journal, December 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmj.h6326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cath Chapman, Tim Slade, Chapman, Cath, Slade, Tim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,280 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 5%
Brazil 5 5%
United Kingdom 5 5%
France 3 3%
Netherlands 3 3%
Switzerland 3 3%
Spain 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 71 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Researcher 22 21%
Professor 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 8 8%
Other 27 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 21%
Unspecified 12 11%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 23 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2005. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2017.
All research outputs
#303
of 8,219,552 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#13
of 34,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 305,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 900 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,219,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 900 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.