You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aluminium adjuvants used in vaccines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013086 |
| Authors |
Snezana Djurisic, Janus C Jakobsen, Sesilje B Petersen, Mette Kenfelt, Sarah Louise Klingenberg, Christian Gluud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Myanmar | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 56 | 85% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#754,114
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,348
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,766
of 343,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.