You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Registration-Associated Patient Misidentification in an Academic Medical Center: Causes and Corrections
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1553-7250(07)33004-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark J. Bittle, Patricia Charache, Daniel M. Wassilchalk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,836,328
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety
#262
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,240
of 168,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them