You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spatial and orientation patterns of experimental stone tool refits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-018-0701-z |
| Authors |
Ignacio de la Torre, Nils Vanwezer, Alfonso Benito-Calvo, Tomos Proffitt, Rafael Mora |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 12 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 9 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 28% |
| Researcher | 10 | 23% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 27 | 63% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,240,643
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#74
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,070
of 352,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.