↓ Skip to main content

Charcot neuroarthropathy patient education among podiatrists in Scotland: a modified Delphi approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Charcot neuroarthropathy patient education among podiatrists in Scotland: a modified Delphi approach
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13047-018-0296-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Bullen, Matthew Young, Carla McArdle, Mairghread Ellis

Abstract

This evaluation sought to determine current Charcot neuroarthropathy (CN) diabetes patient education practices among Scottish National Health Service (NHS) and academic podiatrists and evaluate novel visual tools and develop expert consensus for future practice. Questionnaires collected mixed qualitative and quantitative responses, analysed concurrently within a convergence coding matrix. Delphi methodology permitted member-checking and agreement of consensus over two rounds. Fourteen participants (16.28%) completed a Round One questionnaire, leading to the generation of four themes; Experience; Person-Centred Care and the Content and Context of CN patient education. Seven consensus statements were subsequently developed and six achieved over 80% agreement among 16 participants (18.60%) with a Round Two questionnaire. Respondents agreed CN patient education should be considered for all 'At-risk' individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Verbal metaphors, including the 'rocker-bottom' foot, soft or brittle bones, collapsing, walking on honeycomb and a shattering lightbulb were frequently employed. Visual tools, including visual metaphors and The Charcot Foot Thermometer, were positively evaluated and made available online. Key findings included respondent's belief that CN education should be considered for all individuals with DPN and the frequent use of simile, analogy and metaphor in CN education. The concept of 'remission' proved controversial due to its potential for misinterpretation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,505,936
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#134
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,180
of 353,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.