↓ Skip to main content

Hiponatremia, mortalidad y hemodiálisis: una asociación no explicada

Overview of attention for article published in Nefrología (Madrid), January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hiponatremia, mortalidad y hemodiálisis: una asociación no explicada
Published in
Nefrología (Madrid), January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.nefro.2015.10.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Pérez-García, Inés Palomares, José Ignacio Merello, Rosa Ramos, Francisco Maduell, Manolo Molina, Pedro Aljama, Daniele Marcelli

Abstract

As in the general population, in patients on haemodialysis (HD) hyponatraemia is associated with higher mortality risk. The objective of this article was to study the relationship between predialysis serum sodium (sNa) and mortality in an HD population. We also intended to define hyponatraemia and determine the characteristics of hyponatraemic patients in terms of anthropometric data, analytical features, dialysis measurements and hydration (bioimpedance). Observational, descriptive study of a cohort of HD incident patients. The independent variable was the mean of each patient's sNa analysed during their first 6 months on HD. A total of 4,153 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 64.7 years; 65.2% of the patients were male and 35% were diabetics. Mean follow-up time was 21.48 (SD) (1.31) months. sNa had a normal distribution, with a mean (SD)=138.46 (2.7) mEq/l. Body weight, diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, interdialytic weight gain, total ultrafiltration, serum glucose, albumin and creatinine, vascular access and haemodialysis type, acquire significant differences between sodium quartiles. Lean tissue index (LTI) in patients with low serum sodium, Q1 (135 mEq/l), was significantly lower than the LTI of patients from the other serum sodium quartiles. Patients with sNa<136 mEq/l had a higher independent mortality risk (OR=1.62) (Cox regression analysis). HD patients with hyponatraemia patients have a poor prognosis and present malnutrition or fluid overload.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Other 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 3 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,154,245
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Nefrología (Madrid)
#4
of 20 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,296
of 402,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nefrología (Madrid)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.6. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them