You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-011-0569-5 |
| Authors |
Lutz Bornmann, Markus Wolf, Hans-Dieter Daniel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Librarian | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |