You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Frequency of Misinterpretation of Inconclusive Noninferiority Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Surgery, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3222 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sergio A. Acuna, Fahima Dossa, Nancy N. Baxter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 13% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 25 | 36% |
| Scientists | 15 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 56% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#994,939
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#999
of 5,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,380
of 447,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#19
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.