↓ Skip to main content

Frequency of Misinterpretation of Inconclusive Noninferiority Trials

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Surgery, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
74 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Frequency of Misinterpretation of Inconclusive Noninferiority Trials
Published in
JAMA Surgery, January 2019
DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio A. Acuna, Fahima Dossa, Nancy N. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2020.
All research outputs
#490,642
of 15,680,198 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#598
of 2,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,571
of 277,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#33
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,680,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.