You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/jeu.12691 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sina M. Adl, David Bass, Christopher E. Lane, Julius Lukeš, Conrad L. Schoch, Alexey Smirnov, Sabine Agatha, Cedric Berney, Matthew W. Brown, Fabien Burki, Paco Cárdenas, Ivan Čepička, Lyudmila Chistyakova, Javier del Campo, Micah Dunthorn, Bente Edvardsen, Yana Eglit, Laure Guillou, Vladimír Hampl, Aaron A. Heiss, Mona Hoppenrath, Timothy Y. James, Anna Karnkowska, Sergey Karpov, Eunsoo Kim, Martin Kolisko, Alexander Kudryavtsev, Daniel J.G. Lahr, Enrique Lara, Line Le Gall, Denis H. Lynn, David G. Mann, Ramon Massana, Edward A.D. Mitchell, Christine Morrow, Jong Soo Park, Jan W. Pawlowski, Martha J. Powell, Daniel J. Richter, Sonja Rueckert, Lora Shadwick, Satoshi Shimano, Frederick W. Spiegel, Guifré Torruella, Noha Youssef, Vasily Zlatogursky, Qianqian Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 273 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 41 | 15% |
| United States | 18 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 4% |
| Canada | 10 | 4% |
| France | 9 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 3% |
| Sweden | 4 | 1% |
| China | 3 | 1% |
| Czechia | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 143 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 204 | 75% |
| Scientists | 61 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 997 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 997 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 146 | 15% |
| Researcher | 135 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 121 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 103 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 45 | 5% |
| Other | 149 | 15% |
| Unknown | 298 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 256 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 177 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 72 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 42 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 3% |
| Other | 89 | 9% |
| Unknown | 333 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 241. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#159,815
of 25,885,956 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
#1
of 1,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,306
of 449,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,409 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.