↓ Skip to main content

Current Trends in Immunity and Respiratory Infections

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Current Trends in Immunity and Respiratory Infections'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 223 Antibody Response to Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in the Northern and the Southern Hemisphere in Elite Athletes
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 224 Respiratory Infections with Particular Emphasis on Influenza Virus Activity in Persons Over 14 Years of Age in the Epidemic Season 2016/2017 in Poland
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 225 Cell Activation and Cytokine Release Ex Vivo: Estimation of Reproducibility of the Whole-Blood Assay with Fresh Human Blood
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 232 Antibodies to Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin in the 2016/2017 Epidemic Season in Poland
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 233 Knowledge Regarding Influenza and Influenza Vaccination in General Population: Results of a National Survey in Poland
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 237 Virological Situation in Poland in the 2016/2017 Epidemic Season Based on Sentinel Data
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 240 Influenza: Underestimated in Children Below 2 Years of Age
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 244 Infections with Influenza A/H3N2/ Subtype in Poland in the 2016/2017 Epidemic Season
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 245 Influence of Different Bacteria Strains Isolated from Septic Children on Release and Degradation of Extracellular Traps by Neutrophils from Healthy Adults
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 246 Immunomodulatory Role of Vitamin D: A Review
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 262 Adverse Reactions in Antifolate-Treated Toxoplasmic Retinochoroiditis
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 263 Disorders of Humoral Immunity in Children with IgG Subclass Deficiency and Recurrent Respiratory Infections
Attention for Chapter 225: Cell Activation and Cytokine Release Ex Vivo: Estimation of Reproducibility of the Whole-Blood Assay with Fresh Human Blood
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cell Activation and Cytokine Release Ex Vivo: Estimation of Reproducibility of the Whole-Blood Assay with Fresh Human Blood
Chapter number 225
Book title
Current Trends in Immunity and Respiratory Infections
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/5584_2018_225
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-001634-0, 978-3-03-001635-7
Authors

Verena Liebers, Benjamin Kendzia, Heike Stubel, Gerda Borowitzki, Vitali Gering, Christian Monsé, Olaf Hagemeyer, Rolf Merget, Thomas Brüning, Monika Raulf, Liebers, Verena, Kendzia, Benjamin, Stubel, Heike, Borowitzki, Gerda, Gering, Vitali, Monsé, Christian, Hagemeyer, Olaf, Merget, Rolf, Brüning, Thomas, Raulf, Monika

Abstract

The whole-blood assay (WBA) with human fresh blood may provide insight into the features of an individual's innate immunity. To assess this, ex vivo cytokine release is measured after stimulation of whole blood with various stimuli, for instance, endotoxin in vitro. The aim of the present study was to evaluate WBA reproducibility with fresh blood using different calculation models. The blood was collected from 16 healthy volunteers on 6 different days. Ex vivo stimulation was performed in each individual's blood sample for 22 h, using different endotoxin concentrations. Interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-8 release were quantified using specific immunoassays in the cell-free supernatant. We found that a dose-response relationship between endotoxin and cytokine concentration could be verified for all blood donors in all tests. The median coefficient of variation of the repeated tests was 29% for IL-1β and 52% for IL-8. Upon stimulation with 40 pg/mL endotoxin, a confidence interval of 60-140% was calculated for IL-1β and 70-271% for IL-8 regarding test reproducibility. Furthermore, the classification into high or low responder was reproducible. We conclude that repeated blood collection offers an opportunity to evaluate the variability of WBA. Considering a high intragroup variability, an individual range assessment has been suggested to evaluate exposure effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Researcher 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Unknown 3 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,523,725
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#4,002
of 4,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,477
of 442,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#197
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.