You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disadvantage of Social Sensitivity: Interaction of Oxytocin Receptor Genotype and Child Maltreatment on Brain Structure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Psychiatry, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Udo Dannlowski, Harald Kugel, Dominik Grotegerd, Ronny Redlich, Nils Opel, Katharina Dohm, Dario Zaremba, Anne Grögler, Juliane Schwieren, Thomas Suslow, Patricia Ohrmann, Jochen Bauer, Axel Krug, Tilo Kircher, Andreas Jansen, Katharina Domschke, Christa Hohoff, Pienie Zwitserlood, Markus Heinrichs, Volker Arolt, Walter Heindel, Bernhard T. Baune |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 293 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 17% |
| Researcher | 43 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 9% |
| Other | 55 | 18% |
| Unknown | 55 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 103 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 40 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,083,151
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#3,378
of 6,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,449
of 399,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#40
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.