↓ Skip to main content

An Image-Free Opto-Mechanical System for Creating Virtual Environments and Imaging Neuronal Activity in Freely Moving Caenorhabditis elegans

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Image-Free Opto-Mechanical System for Creating Virtual Environments and Imaging Neuronal Activity in Freely Moving Caenorhabditis elegans
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024666
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serge Faumont, Gary Rondeau, Tod R. Thiele, Kristy J. Lawton, Kathryn E. McCormick, Matthew Sottile, Oliver Griesbeck, Ellie S. Heckscher, William M. Roberts, Chris Q. Doe, Shawn R. Lockery

Abstract

Non-invasive recording in untethered animals is arguably the ultimate step in the analysis of neuronal function, but such recordings remain elusive. To address this problem, we devised a system that tracks neuron-sized fluorescent targets in real time. The system can be used to create virtual environments by optogenetic activation of sensory neurons, or to image activity in identified neurons at high magnification. By recording activity in neurons of freely moving C. elegans, we tested the long-standing hypothesis that forward and reverse locomotion are generated by distinct neuronal circuits. Surprisingly, we found motor neurons that are active during both types of locomotion, suggesting a new model of locomotion control in C. elegans. These results emphasize the importance of recording neuronal activity in freely moving animals and significantly expand the potential of imaging techniques by providing a mean to stabilize fluorescent targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 170 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 32%
Researcher 34 19%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 40%
Neuroscience 24 13%
Engineering 18 10%
Physics and Astronomy 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 23 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,711,294
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#48,281
of 225,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,225
of 145,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#453
of 2,584 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,584 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.