↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for prevention of giant retinal tear in the fellow eye

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for prevention of giant retinal tear in the fellow eye
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006909.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ghee Soon Ang, John Townend, Noemi Lois

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 67%
Student > Bachelor 5 28%
Student > Master 5 28%
Other 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 22%
Other 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 122%
Chemistry 6 33%
Psychology 3 17%
Unspecified 3 17%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2015.
All research outputs
#11,143,390
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,923
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,570
of 349,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#191
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.