↓ Skip to main content

Emergent Patterns of Social Affiliation in Primates, a Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergent Patterns of Social Affiliation in Primates, a Model
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, December 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000630
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ivan Puga-Gonzalez, Hanno Hildenbrandt, Charlotte K. Hemelrijk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 166 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 22%
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Master 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 47%
Psychology 23 13%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Computer Science 10 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,893,782
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,830
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,854
of 174,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#22
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.