You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing Expectations: Towards a Toolbox for an Ethics of Emerging Technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NanoEthics, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11569-011-0119-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Federica Lucivero, Tsjalling Swierstra, Marianne Boenink |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 30 | 28% |
| Philosophy | 15 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 27% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,969,262
of 24,047,183 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#30
of 250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,167
of 119,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,047,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them