↓ Skip to main content

An Exploration on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Production by Insect Species Suitable for Animal or Human Consumption

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
561 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An Exploration on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Production by Insect Species Suitable for Animal or Human Consumption
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014445
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis G. A. B. Oonincx, Joost van Itterbeeck, Marcel J. W. Heetkamp, Henry van den Brand, Joop J. A. van Loon, Arnold van Huis

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) production, as a cause of climate change, is considered as one of the biggest problems society is currently facing. The livestock sector is one of the large contributors of anthropogenic GHG emissions. Also, large amounts of ammonia (NH(3)), leading to soil nitrification and acidification, are produced by livestock. Therefore other sources of animal protein, like edible insects, are currently being considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1162 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 216 18%
Student > Master 212 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 146 12%
Researcher 115 10%
Other 39 3%
Other 142 12%
Unknown 314 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 415 35%
Environmental Science 90 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 5%
Engineering 35 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 34 3%
Other 184 16%
Unknown 361 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 459. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#60,466
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,024
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191
of 194,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#7
of 1,126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.