↓ Skip to main content

Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
84 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
378 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005179.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn A Birnie, Melanie Noel, Christine T Chambers, Lindsay S Uman, Jennifer A Parker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 367 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 103 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 18%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Researcher 43 11%
Unspecified 42 11%
Other 152 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 176 47%
Psychology 77 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 72 19%
Unspecified 61 16%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Other 57 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#294,323
of 13,652,000 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#768
of 10,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,266
of 265,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,652,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.