↓ Skip to main content

Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
85 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005179.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn A Birnie, Melanie Noel, Christine T Chambers, Lindsay S Uman, Jennifer A Parker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 282 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Researcher 31 11%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 58 21%
Unknown 51 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 20%
Psychology 38 13%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 63 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#241,617
of 15,549,524 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#530
of 11,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,092
of 276,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,549,524 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.