↓ Skip to main content

Evidence that RNA Viruses Drove Adaptive Introgression between Neanderthals and Modern Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
66 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
565 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Evidence that RNA Viruses Drove Adaptive Introgression between Neanderthals and Modern Humans
Published in
Cell, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.034
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Enard, Dmitri A. Petrov

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 565 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 22%
Student > Bachelor 34 12%
Student > Master 33 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 30 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 92 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 41 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 896. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2021.
All research outputs
#10,284
of 17,947,092 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#88
of 15,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274
of 285,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#4
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,947,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.