↓ Skip to main content

Evidence that RNA Viruses Drove Adaptive Introgression between Neanderthals and Modern Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 14,805)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
60 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
506 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
4 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Evidence that RNA Viruses Drove Adaptive Introgression between Neanderthals and Modern Humans
Published in
Cell, October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.034
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Enard, Dmitri A. Petrov

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 506 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 25%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Unspecified 13 8%
Other 31 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 31%
Unspecified 18 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 30 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 814. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,724
of 13,090,275 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#46
of 14,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281
of 264,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#5
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,090,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.