You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dose response of the 16p11.2 distal copy number variant on intracranial volume and basal ganglia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Psychiatry, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41380-018-0118-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ida E Sønderby, Ómar Gústafsson, Nhat Trung Doan, Derrek P Hibar, Sandra Martin-Brevet, Abdel Abdellaoui, David Ames, Katrin Amunts, Michael Andersson, Nicola J Armstrong, Manon Bernard, Nicholas Blackburn, John Blangero, Dorret I Boomsma, Janita Bralten, Hans-Richard Brattbak, Henry Brodaty, Rachel M Brouwer, Robin Bülow, Vince Calhoun, Svenja Caspers, Gianpiero Cavalleri, Chi-Hua Chen, Sven Cichon, Simone Ciufolini, Aiden Corvin, Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Joanne E Curran, Anders M Dale, Shareefa Dalvie, Paola Dazzan, Eco J C de Geus, Greig I. de Zubicaray, Sonja M. C. de Zwarte, Norman Delanty, Anouk den Braber, Sylvane Desrivières, Gary Donohoe, Bogdan Draganski, Stefan Ehrlich, Thomas Espeseth, Simon E Fisher, Barbara Franke, Vincent Frouin, Masaki Fukunaga, Thomas Gareau, David C Glahn, Hans Grabe, Nynke A. Groenewold, Jan Haavik, Asta Håberg, Ryota Hashimoto, Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa, Andreas Heinz, Manon H. J. Hillegers, Per Hoffmann, Laurena Holleran, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Hilleke E Hulshoff, Masashi Ikeda, Neda Jahanshad, Terry Jernigan, Christiane Jockwitz, Stefan Johansson, Gudrun A Jonsdottir, Erik G Jönsson, Rene Kahn, Tobias Kaufmann, Sinead Kelly, Masataka Kikuchi, Emma E M Knowles, Knut K Kolskår, John B Kwok, Stephanie Le Hellard, Costin Leu, Jingyu Liu, Astri J Lundervold, Arvid Lundervold, Nicholas G. Martin, Karen Mather, Samuel R. Mathias, Mark McCormack, Katie L. McMahon, Allan McRae, Yuri Milaneschi, Clara Moreau, Derek Morris, David Mothersill, Thomas W Mühleisen, Robin Murray, Jan E Nordvik, Lars Nyberg, Loes M Olde Loohuis, Roel Ophoff, Tomas Paus, Zdenka Pausova, Brenda Penninx, Juan M Peralta, Bruce Pike, Carlos Prieto, Sara Pudas, Erin Quinlan, Daniel S Quintana, Céline S Reinbold, Tiago Reis Marques, Alexandre Reymond, Genevieve Richard, Borja Rodriguez-Herreros, Roberto Roiz-Santiañez, Jarek Rokicki, James Rucker, Perminder Sachdev, Anne-Marthe Sanders, Sigrid B Sando, Lianne Schmaal, Peter R Schofield, Andrew J. Schork, Gunter Schumann, Jean Shin, Elena Shumskaya, Sanjay Sisodiya, Vidar M Steen, Dan J Stein, Stacy Steinberg, Lachlan Strike, Alexander Teumer, Anbu Thalamuthu, Diana Tordesillas-Gutierrez, Jessica Turner, Torill Ueland, Anne Uhlmann, Magnus O. Ulfarsson, Dennis van ’t Ent, Dennis van der Meer, Neeltje E. M. van Haren, Anja Vaskinn, Evangelos Vassos, G. Bragi Walters, Yunpeng Wang, Wei Wen, Christopher D Whelan, Katharina Wittfeld, Margie Wright, Hidenaga Yamamori, Tetyana Zayats, Ingrid Agartz, Lars T Westlye, Sébastien Jacquemont, Srdjan Djurovic, Hreinn Stefánsson, Kári Stefánsson, Paul Thompson, Ole A. Andreassen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| Finland | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 53% |
| Scientists | 16 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Professor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 64 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 10% |
| Psychology | 20 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 83 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,581,496
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Psychiatry
#1,233
of 4,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,926
of 356,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Psychiatry
#27
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.