↓ Skip to main content

OPtimising Treatment for MIld Systolic hypertension in the Elderly (OPTiMISE): protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
OPtimising Treatment for MIld Systolic hypertension in the Elderly (OPTiMISE): protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Published in
BMJ Open, October 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022930
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P Sheppard, Jenni Burt, Mark Lown, Eleanor Temple, John Benson, Gary A Ford, Carl Heneghan, F D Richard Hobbs, Sue Jowett, Paul Little, Jonathan Mant, Jill Mollison, Alecia Nickless, Emma Ogburn, Rupert Payne, Marney Williams, Ly-Mee Yu, Richard J McManus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Librarian 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 11%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 10 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2020.
All research outputs
#10,208,854
of 16,018,764 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#11,099
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,007
of 277,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#362
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,018,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.