↓ Skip to main content

OPtimising Treatment for MIld Systolic hypertension in the Elderly (OPTiMISE): protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
OPtimising Treatment for MIld Systolic hypertension in the Elderly (OPTiMISE): protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Published in
BMJ Open, October 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022930
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P Sheppard, Jenni Burt, Mark Lown, Eleanor Temple, John Benson, Gary A Ford, Carl Heneghan, F D Richard Hobbs, Sue Jowett, Paul Little, Jonathan Mant, Jill Mollison, Alecia Nickless, Emma Ogburn, Rupert Payne, Marney Williams, Ly-Mee Yu, Richard J McManus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 29%
Researcher 4 17%
Unspecified 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Librarian 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Social Sciences 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Unspecified 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Other 8 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,826,706
of 13,605,490 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#10,487
of 12,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,721
of 263,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#397
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,605,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.