↓ Skip to main content

Acceptability of two- versus three-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedule among providers and mothers of adolescent girls: a mixed-methods study in five countries

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acceptability of two- versus three-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedule among providers and mothers of adolescent girls: a mixed-methods study in five countries
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10552-018-1085-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Yasmine Islam, Alexis M. Hoyt, Silvina Ramos, Karen Morgan, Chan Joo Kim, Sylvia de Sanjose, Nicole Butera, Virginia Senkomago, Karin L. Richter, Mary Anne McDonald, Nadja A. Vielot, Jennifer S. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 35 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 19 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 42 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,171,492
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#1,632
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,859
of 347,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.