↓ Skip to main content

Diuretics for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diuretics for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001454.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Audra Stewart, Luc P Brion, Roger Soll

Abstract

Lung edema may complicate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 14%
Netherlands 1 7%
Canada 1 7%
Unknown 10 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 36%
Student > Postgraduate 4 29%
Researcher 4 29%
Other 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 21%
Other 10 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 114%
Unspecified 7 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#1,190,690
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,317
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,393
of 213,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#181
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.