↓ Skip to main content

Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme
Published in
Biology Direct, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-6-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne M Brown, Samantha L Hoopes, Robert H White, Catherine A Sarisky

Abstract

The ability to perform de novo biosynthesis of purines is present in organisms in all three domains of life, reflecting the essentiality of these molecules to life. Although the pathway is quite similar in eukaryotes and bacteria, the archaeal pathway is more variable. A careful manual curation of genes in this pathway demonstrates the value of manual curation in archaea, even in pathways that have been well-studied in other domains.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 4%
Mexico 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 48 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 30%
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 28%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#264
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,215
of 245,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.