↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced validation of antibodies for research applications

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhanced validation of antibodies for research applications
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06642-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fredrik Edfors, Andreas Hober, Klas Linderbäck, Gianluca Maddalo, Alireza Azimi, Åsa Sivertsson, Hanna Tegel, Sophia Hober, Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto, Linn Fagerberg, Kalle von Feilitzen, Per Oksvold, Cecilia Lindskog, Björn Forsström, Mathias Uhlen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Neuroscience 10 10%
Engineering 4 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 30 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,968,121
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#25,878
of 57,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,811
of 358,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#662
of 1,455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.