You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toward elucidating diversity of neural mechanisms underlying insect learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zoological Letters, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40851-014-0008-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Makoto Mizunami, Yoshitaka Hamanaka, Hiroshi Nishino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 31% |
| Researcher | 7 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,547,315
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Zoological Letters
#139
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,955
of 358,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoological Letters
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.