You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative effectiveness of malaria prevention measures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasites & Vectors, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13071-018-2783-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kinley Wangdi, Luis Furuya-Kanamori, Justin Clark, Jan J. Barendregt, Michelle L. Gatton, Cathy Banwell, Gerard C. Kelly, Suhail A. R. Doi, Archie C. A. Clements |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 248 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 95 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 13% |
| Unknown | 106 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,556,372
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,131
of 5,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,287
of 330,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#41
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.