↓ Skip to main content

Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Root coverage procedures for treating localised and multiple recession-type defects
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007161.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leandro Chambrone, Maria Aparecida Salinas Ortega, Flávia Sukekava, Roberto Rotundo, Zamira Kalemaj, Jacopo Buti, Giovan Paolo Pini Prato

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Postgraduate 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 33 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 41 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2021.
All research outputs
#831,044
of 17,003,338 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,206
of 11,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,200
of 281,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,003,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.