↓ Skip to main content

Should doctors be able to exclude patients from pay-for-performance schemes?

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Should doctors be able to exclude patients from pay-for-performance schemes?
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, December 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Roland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 9%
South Africa 1 5%
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 18 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Unspecified 3 14%
Other 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Unspecified 3 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 5 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,178,579
of 12,467,785 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#840
of 1,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,896
of 348,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#33
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,467,785 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.