↓ Skip to main content

Cryptic Diversity of African Tigerfish (Genus Hydrocynus) Reveals Palaeogeographic Signatures of Linked Neogene Geotectonic Events

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cryptic Diversity of African Tigerfish (Genus Hydrocynus) Reveals Palaeogeographic Signatures of Linked Neogene Geotectonic Events
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0028775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah A. M. Goodier, Fenton P. D. Cotterill, Colleen O'Ryan, Paul H. Skelton, Maarten J. de Wit

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 5 4%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 131 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Master 25 18%
Professor 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 72 52%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 9%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 21 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,750
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,143
of 255,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#845
of 3,042 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,042 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.