You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Stroke, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.1177/1747493018806200 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah J Wallace, Linda Worrall, Tanya Rose, Guylaine Le Dorze, Caterina Breitenstein, Katerina Hilari, Edna Babbitt, Arpita Bose, Marian Brady, Leora R. Cherney, David Copland, Madeline Cruice, Pam Enderby, Deborah Hersh, Tami Howe, Helen Kelly, Swathi Kiran, Ann-Charlotte Laska, Jane Marshall, Marjorie Nicholas, Janet Patterson, Gill Pearl, Elizabeth Rochon, Miranda Rose, Karen Sage, Steven Small, Janet Webster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 30 | 32% |
Australia | 16 | 17% |
United States | 10 | 11% |
Ireland | 5 | 5% |
Austria | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Philippines | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 59 | 63% |
Scientists | 27 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Professor | 11 | 8% |
Other | 28 | 19% |
Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 17 | 12% |
Psychology | 17 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 12% |
Unknown | 58 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#639,461
of 25,152,132 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Stroke
#32
of 1,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,947
of 352,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Stroke
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,152,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.