↓ Skip to main content

The spreading of misinformation online

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2359 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The spreading of misinformation online
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1517441113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H. Eugene Stanley, Walter Quattrociocchi

Abstract

The wide availability of user-provided content in online social media facilitates the aggregation of people around common interests, worldviews, and narratives. However, the World Wide Web (WWW) also allows for the rapid dissemination of unsubstantiated rumors and conspiracy theories that often elicit rapid, large, but naive social responses such as the recent case of Jade Helm 15--where a simple military exercise turned out to be perceived as the beginning of a new civil war in the United States. In this work, we address the determinants governing misinformation spreading through a thorough quantitative analysis. In particular, we focus on how Facebook users consume information related to two distinct narratives: scientific and conspiracy news. We find that, although consumers of scientific and conspiracy stories present similar consumption patterns with respect to content, cascade dynamics differ. Selective exposure to content is the primary driver of content diffusion and generates the formation of homogeneous clusters, i.e., "echo chambers." Indeed, homogeneity appears to be the primary driver for the diffusion of contents and each echo chamber has its own cascade dynamics. Finally, we introduce a data-driven percolation model mimicking rumor spreading and we show that homogeneity and polarization are the main determinants for predicting cascades' size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 981 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Italy 5 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Slovenia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 16 <1%
Unknown 2301 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 433 18%
Student > Master 347 15%
Student > Bachelor 293 12%
Researcher 241 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 118 5%
Other 439 19%
Unknown 488 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 507 21%
Computer Science 301 13%
Psychology 218 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 94 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 4%
Other 565 24%
Unknown 586 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1771. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,896
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#188
of 103,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48
of 402,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3
of 839 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 839 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.