↓ Skip to main content

Dietary modifications for infantile colic

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
256 tweeters
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary modifications for infantile colic
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011029.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morris Gordon, Elena Biagioli, Miriam Sorrenti, Carla Lingua, Lorenzo Moja, Shel SC Banks, Simone Ceratto, Francesco Savino

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 256 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 20 17%
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Other 11 9%
Other 39 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 34%
Unspecified 27 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 17%
Psychology 9 8%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Other 15 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#66,255
of 13,658,530 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 10,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,596
of 263,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,658,530 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.