↓ Skip to main content

Dietary modifications for infantile colic

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
253 tweeters
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary modifications for infantile colic
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011029.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Morris Gordon, Elena Biagioli, Miriam Sorrenti, Carla Lingua, Lorenzo Moja, Shel SC Banks, Simone Ceratto, Francesco Savino

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 253 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 255 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 15%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 61 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 21%
Psychology 12 5%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 72 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#97,534
of 17,475,439 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#188
of 11,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,760
of 283,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,475,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.