↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: attachment systems for implant overdentures in edentulous jaws
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008001.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan GT Payne, Nabeel HM Alsabeeha, Momen A Atieh, Marco Esposito, Sunyoung Ma, Marwah Anas El-Wegoud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 13 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 46%
Unspecified 14 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2019.
All research outputs
#625,799
of 13,555,081 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,995
of 10,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,469
of 263,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,555,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.