↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of aging in place in the United States: protocol for a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experiences of aging in place in the United States: protocol for a systematic review and meta-ethnography of qualitative studies
Published in
Systematic Reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13643-018-0820-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Rosenwohl-Mack, Karen Schumacher, Min-Lin Fang, Yoshimi Fukuoka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,833,526
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,020
of 346,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#35
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,010 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.