↓ Skip to main content

The role of light in Chagas disease infection risk in Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of light in Chagas disease infection risk in Colombia
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-015-1240-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana Erazo, Juan Cordovez

Abstract

Chagas disease is the most important vector-borne disease in Latin America and Rhodnius prolixus is the main vector in Colombia. Control strategies in this region have shown poor outcomes due to the insect's ability to disperse between the sylvatic and the domestic habitat. Because insect migration to houses is responsible to sustain contact rates between vectors and humans, understanding the risk factors that promote migration could be important in designing control strategies. In this respect, it has been reported that adult triatomines have the ability to move over long ranges at night attracted by artificial light. Thus, light bulbs could be playing a critical role in house invasion. The main objective of this study is to understand the role of artificial light, or simply light, in house infestation by R. prolixus. To investigate the role of light, we combined fieldwork in the village of Chavinave, Casanare, Colombia and a mathematical model of Rhodnius prolixus dynamics. The model allowed us to simulate insect mobility and distribution in the village based on field results. We created 11 scenarios representing different amounts of light in the village (from 0 to 100 %, with increments of 10 %) with 100 simulations each for a time of 1000 days (2.7 years) and compare the results between the scenarios. None of the Gomez-Nuñez traps were positive at any stage of the study, suggesting that insects do not colonize houses. The model predicts that with current village connections the proportion of houses that have visiting insects should be around 98 %. Additionally we showed that an increase in light allows for insect spreading and migration to previously un-infested areas. Increments in light could increase the contact rates between vectors and humans; a two-fold increase in human cases for a 30 % increase in the use and visibility of light on this particular village was estimated with the model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#5,010,894
of 24,626,543 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,083
of 5,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,633
of 403,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#23
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,626,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.