↓ Skip to main content

Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in ScienceOpen Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
18 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
356 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness
Published in
ScienceOpen Research, January 2016
DOI 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.aetbzc.v1
Authors

Anne Boring, Kellie Ottoboni, Philip Stark

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 356 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Canada 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 410 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 18%
Researcher 64 15%
Professor 44 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 37 9%
Student > Master 35 8%
Other 119 28%
Unknown 51 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 93 22%
Psychology 45 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 9%
Engineering 18 4%
Arts and Humanities 17 4%
Other 147 34%
Unknown 71 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 539. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#24,187
of 17,697,618 outputs
Outputs from ScienceOpen Research
#1
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#517
of 377,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ScienceOpen Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,697,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them