↓ Skip to main content

Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in ScienceOpen Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
15 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
336 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness
Published in
ScienceOpen Research, January 2016
DOI 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.aetbzc.v1
Authors

Philip Stark, Kellie Ottoboni, Anne Boring

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 336 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 4%
Canada 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 233 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 20%
Researcher 33 13%
Professor 31 12%
Student > Master 26 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 10%
Other 89 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 54 21%
Unspecified 36 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 13%
Psychology 27 11%
Engineering 15 6%
Other 91 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 503. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,021
of 12,533,239 outputs
Outputs from ScienceOpen Research
#1
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#546
of 352,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ScienceOpen Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,533,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them