↓ Skip to main content

Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness

Overview of attention for article published in ScienceOpen Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
18 blogs
twitter
383 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
217 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
510 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness
Published in
ScienceOpen Research, January 2016
DOI 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-edu.aetbzc.v1
Authors

Anne Boring, Kellie Ottoboni, Philip Stark

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 383 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
Canada 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 490 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 18%
Researcher 69 14%
Professor 47 9%
Student > Master 43 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 42 8%
Other 142 28%
Unknown 74 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 99 19%
Psychology 51 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 8%
Engineering 24 5%
Arts and Humanities 20 4%
Other 174 34%
Unknown 102 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 627. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2022.
All research outputs
#26,267
of 21,775,893 outputs
Outputs from ScienceOpen Research
#1
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#405
of 405,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ScienceOpen Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,775,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them