↓ Skip to main content

Fuelling conditions at staging sites can mitigate Arctic warming effects in a migratory bird

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
71 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Fuelling conditions at staging sites can mitigate Arctic warming effects in a migratory bird
Published in
Nature Communications, October 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06673-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eldar Rakhimberdiev, Sjoerd Duijns, Julia Karagicheva, Cornelis J. Camphuysen, Anne Dekinga, Rob Dekker, Anatoly Gavrilov, Job ten Horn, Joop Jukema, Anatoly Saveliev, Mikhail Soloviev, T. Lee Tibbitts, Jan A. van Gils, Theunis Piersma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 10 24%
Unspecified 7 17%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 51%
Environmental Science 9 22%
Unspecified 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#281,934
of 12,961,392 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#5,121
of 22,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,445
of 260,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#10
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,961,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.