You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Silage microbiology and its control through additives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1516-35982010001300021 |
| Authors |
Richard E. Muck |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 2% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 1% |
| Professor | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 83 | 89% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 91% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#47
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,423
of 109,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.