You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Label-Free Morphology-Based Prediction of Multiple Differentiation Potentials of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Early Evaluation of Intact Cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0093952 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hiroto Sasaki, Ichiro Takeuchi, Mai Okada, Rumi Sawada, Kei Kanie, Yasujiro Kiyota, Hiroyuki Honda, Ryuji Kato |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
Researcher | 14 | 19% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 17% |
Engineering | 8 | 11% |
Computer Science | 6 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,778,877
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,328
of 197,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,547
of 226,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,505
of 5,492 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,492 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.