↓ Skip to main content

Tuberculosis Treatment in HIV Infected Ugandans with CD4 Counts >350 Cells/mm3 Reduces Immune Activation with No Effect on HIV Load or CD4 Count

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tuberculosis Treatment in HIV Infected Ugandans with CD4 Counts >350 Cells/mm3 Reduces Immune Activation with No Effect on HIV Load or CD4 Count
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009138
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Scott Mahan, Maria Walusimbi, Denise F. Johnson, Christina Lancioni, Edwin Charlebois, Joyce Baseke, Keith A. Chervenak, Roy D. Mugerwa, Diane V. Havlir, Harriet Mayanja-Kizza, Christopher C. Whalen, W. Henry Boom

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 9 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,778,877
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,328
of 197,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,446
of 94,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#238
of 668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.